Percepción de profesores universitarios mexicanos sobre el buen formador de profesores de Educación Física

Autores/as

Martín Francisco González-Villalobos

Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara

martinv@cucs.udg.mx

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9924-2039

Juan Ricardo López-Taylor

Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara

taylor@cucs.udg.mx

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-7937

Ana Isabel Díaz-Villanueva

Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara

anai_37@hotmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-8944

Edtna Elvira Jáuregui-Ulloa

Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara

martinv@cucs.udg.mx

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8136-3844

Resumen

En la última década se ha incrementado la investigación sobre los formadores de profesores (FP) de Educación Física (EF). En México, sin embargo, esta producción es escasa y muchas preguntas relevantes siguen sin respuesta. Es necesario desarrollar una comprensión más completa de este grupo profesional, ya que es parte integral para la profesión de la EF. El presente estudio se desarrolló usando la teoría de la socialización ocupacional. El objetivo fue describir e interpretar las percepciones sobre el concepto de buen FP de EF que poseen profesores universitarios (quienes son también formadores de profesores) de universidades públicas en México. Participaron 202 FP, a quienes se les pidió específicamente responder la siguiente cuestión: describa lo que es para usted un buen profesor de Educación Superior, formador de profesores. Para el tratamiento de la información, en primera instancia se utilizó el análisis de contenido; posteriormente, se usó la estadística descriptiva, concretamente, las frecuencias y los porcentajes. Los resultados revelan que, para los FP, un buen formador se caracteriza principalmente por sus rasgos de personalidad, seguido de las competencias científicas y pedagógicas.seguido de las competencias científicas y pedagógicas.

Palabras clave

Educación Física formador de docentes formadores de formadores formador de profesores percepción

Cómo citar

González-Villalobos, M. F., López-Taylor, J. R., Díaz-Villanueva, A. I., & Jáuregui-Ulloa, E. E. (2019). Percepción de profesores universitarios mexicanos sobre el buen formador de profesores de Educación Física. RECIE. Revista Caribeña De Investigación Educativa, 3(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2019.v3i2.pp99-109

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Arredondo, M. (2007). Formadores de formadores. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 12(33), 473-486. https://bit.ly/2LpaqYC

Australian Institute for Training and School Leadership (2018). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved Nov 25, 2019.

Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de Contenido. Akal.

Buchberger, F., Campos, B., Kallos, D., & Stephenson, J. (2000). Green paper on teacher education in Europe: High quality teacher education for high quality education and training. TNTEE Editorial Office. https://bit.ly/2Ro2ISi

Burden, J., Harrison, L., & Hodge, S. (2005). Perceptions of African American faculty in kinesiology-based programs at predominantly White American institutions of higher education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599283

Carvalho, M. (2003). Perceções de formadores de professores em educação física no ensino superior universitário. (Tesis de maestría). Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.

Casey, A., & Fletcher, T. (2012). Trading places: from physical education teachers to teacher educators. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(4), 362-380. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.31.4.362

Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0

Cunha, A. (2010). Representação do “bom” Professor: O “bom” Professor em Geral e o “bom” Pofessor de Educação Física em Particular. Educação em Revista, 11(2), 41-52. https://bit.ly/2s1p1mk

Dowling, F. (2006). Physical education teacher educators’ professional identities, continuing professional development and the issue of gender equality. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(3), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980600986306

Fletcher, T., & Casey, A. (2014). The challenges of models-based practice in physical education teacher education: A collaborative self-study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(3), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2013-0109

Goe, L., & Stickler, L. (2008). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: Making the Most of Recent Research. TQ Research & Policy Brief. National comprehensive center for teacher quality. https://bit.ly/2rRCCMN

González, M. (2016). Percepciones de los Formadores y de los Estudiantes de Educación Física de las universidades Públicas de México. (Tesis doctoral). Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa. https://bit.ly/2PdaueZ

Goodwin, A., & Kosnik, C. (2013). Quality teacher educators = quality teachers? Conceptualizing essential domains of knowledge for those who teach teachers. Teacher Development,17(3), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.813766

Graber, K. (1993). The emergence of faculty consensus concerning teacher education: The socialization process of creating and sustaining faculty agreement. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12(4), 424-436. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.12.4.424

Graber, K., & Schempp, P. (2000). The influence of a generalist-taught methods course. Physical Educator, 57(4), 178. https://bit.ly/2Yo9bOz

Graber, K., Erwin, H., Mays, A., Rhoades, J., & Zhu, W. (2011). A national profile of teacher education faculty: The construction of an online survey. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 15(4), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2011.594353

Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Lunenberg, M. (2005). Teaching teachers-Studies into the expertise of teacher educators: An introduction to this theme issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 107-115.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.007

Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004

Lawson, H. (1987). Occupational socialization, cultural studies, and the physical education curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7(4), 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.7.4.265

Lee, H., & Curtner-Smith, M. (2011). Impact of occupational socialization on the perspectives and practices of sport pedagogy doctoral students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.30.3.296

Lunenberg, M., & Willemse, M. (2006). Research and professional development of teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education,, 29(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760500478621

Maaranen, K., Kynäslahti, H., Byman, R., Jyrhämä, R., & Sintonen, S. (2019). Teacher education matters: Finnish teacher educators’ concerns, beliefs, and values. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 211-227.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1566317

MacPhail, A. (2014). Becoming a teacher educator: Legitimate participation and the reflexivity of being situated. In A. Ovens, T. Fletcher (Eds.). Self-study in Physical Education Teacher Education (pp.47-62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05663-0_4

McCullick, B. (2001). Practitioners’ perspectives on values, knowledge, and skills needed by PETE participants. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.1.35

McEvoy, E., Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & MacPhail, A. (2017). Physical education teacher educators’ views regarding the purpose(s) of school physical education. Sport Education and Society, 22(7), 812-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2015.1075971

McEvoy, E., MacPhail, A., & Heikinaro-Johansson, P. (2015). Physical education teacher educators: A 25-year scoping review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 162-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.005

Mitchell, M. (2006). The Physical Education Teacher Education Faculty Shortage. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 77(3), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2006.10597835

Moore, A. (2004). The good teacher: Dominant discourses in teacher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420270

Richards, K., Templin, T., & Graber, K. (2014). The socialization of teachers in physical education: Review and recommendations for future works. Kinesiology Review, 3(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2013-0006

Ruiz, G. (2015). La formación del profesorado de Educación Física en México: necesidad de un cuerpo troncal (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Extremadura, Extremadura. https://bit.ly/2RmQxFs

Sá, C. (2007). Socialização profissional em educação física percepções de formadores e estudantes do ensino superior politécnico. (Tesis doctoral). Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa. https://bit.ly/2Ls9ant

Soares, S., & Cunha, M. (2010). Formação do professor: a docência universitária em busca de legitimidade. EDUFBA. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788523211981

Swennen, A., & van der Klink, M. (2009). Becoming a teacher educator: Voices of beginning teacher educators. In A. Swennen, L. Shagir, & M. Cooper (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators (pp.91-102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8874-2_7

Van Der Mars, H. (2011). Reflecting on the state of US doctoral PETE programs… “Houston, we’ve had a problem” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.30.2.189

Zabalza, M. (2009). Ser profesor Universitario hoy. La Cuestión Universitaria, (5), 68-80. https://bit.ly/36gttwn

Sección

Artículos