Impact of a triple helix model in South University, University of Guadalajara

Authors

Ricardo Xicoténcatl García Cauzor

University of Guadalajara, México

[email protected]

Elba Rosa Gómez Barajas

University of Guadalajara, México

[email protected]

José Manuel Ríos Ariza

University of Guadalajara, México

[email protected]

Abstract

At University of the South Central (CUSur) of the University of Guadalajara, located in Ciudad Guzmán (Jalisco, Mexico), has, since the year 2011, a project has developed of Triple Helix in which have been linked to the University, local government and the business sector of the Southern Region. Evaluation of the results and the process of the implementation of this project is one of the keys to obtain information, which can serve for decision-making and design strategies that allows the optimization of the performance of the triple helix. The evaluation has focused on various indicators as creation of enterprises and jobs, provided training, advice to entrepreneurs, people who have participated in the activities, etc. The tools used, the data obtained and their interpretation exceeds the limits of what is a research paper. Therefore, we’re going to focus on one of the least studied aspects, on the experiences of Triple Helix, which is the impact of the model on organisational change, in our case, the University Center of South, with the creation of new organizational structures for research.

Keywords

Triple helix organization university

How to Cite

García Cauzor, R. X., Gómez Barajas, E. R., & Ríos Ariza, J. M. (2017). Impact of a triple helix model in South University, University of Guadalajara. Caribbean Educational Research Journal (RECIE), 1(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2017.v1i1.pp7-17

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arocena, A, & J. Sutz. (2001). La Universidad Latinoamericana del futuro. Tendencias, Escenarios, Alternativas. México: UDUAL.

Chang, H. G. (2010). El modelo de la triple hélice como un medio para la vinculación entre la universidad y la empresa. Revista Nacional de Administración, 1(1), 85-94. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2kNfVCO

D’ Este A., Castro E. & Molas-Gallart J. (2009). Manual de Indicadores de Vinculación de la universidad con el entorno socioeconómico. Buenos Aires: OCTS. Recuperado de https://bit. ly/2Lk99Q8

Domingo, J. (2013). Un marco crítico de apoyo para ubicar y redireccionar experiencias innovadoras en educación: comprensión y transformación. Tendencias pedagógicas, 21, 9-28. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Lm9YYP

Estebánez, M. E. (2002). Impacto social de la ciencia y la tecnología: estrategia para su análisis, incluido en El Estado de la Ciencia. Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos/ Interamericanos. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2LUS7ZK

Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research policy, 27(8), 823-833. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2HiDhbY

Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C. (2006). Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 33 (1), 77-83. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2JccAaT

Freeman, C. & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583-589. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2LUfL95

González de la Fe, T. (2009). El modelo de triple hélice de relaciones universidad, industria y gobierno: un análisis crítico. ARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 738, 739-755 Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2MfXQND

Hurtado de Barrera, J. (2000). Metodología de investigación holística. Caracas: Editorial SYPAL.

Luukkonen, T. (2002). Research evaluation in Europe: state of the art. Research Evaluation, 11(2), 81–84.

Molas-Gallart, J., Tang, P., & Morrow, S. (2000). Assessing the non-academic impact of grant-funded socioeconomic research: results from a pilot study. Research Evaluation, 9(3), 171-182.

OCDE (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. París: OECD. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2EfVs4D

Rifkim, J. (2015). La sociedad del costo marginal cero. El Internet de las cosas, el procomún colaborativo y el eclipse del capitalismo. México: Paidós.

Ríos, J. M. & Gómez, E. R. (2011). Innovación en un mundo globalizado: dos casos. En Hernández, R.; Padilla, S. y Arancibia, M. (coords.), Educación Superior, Innovación e Internacionalización. Ensayos, proyectos y experiencias (pp. 203-240). Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara y Universidad Austral de Chile.

Viale, R. & Campodall’Orto, S. (April, 2000). Neocorporations or Evolutionary Triple Helix? Suggestions Coming from European Regions, in the Third Triple Helix Conference, Rio de Janeiro.

Section

Research article

Author Biographies

Ricardo Xicoténcatl García Cauzor, University of Guadalajara, México

Ricardo Xicoténcatl García Cauzor, University of Guadalajara, México

Email: [email protected]

Elba Rosa Gómez Barajas, University of Guadalajara, México

Elba Rosa Gómez Barajas, University of Guadalajara, México        

Email: [email protected]

José Manuel Ríos Ariza, University of Guadalajara, México

José Manuel Ríos Ariza, University of Guadalajara, México        

Email: [email protected]